Expert answer:Trial of OJ Simpson Murder Case Research Question

  

Solved by verified expert:look at attachments for previous project parts that are finishedNow it is time to bring your research together. Please add all parts
from the previous weeks and create a final paper for submission.Write a one to two pages explaining the findings of your research
form the previous weeks. Repeat your selected research questions and
base your conclusion on your findings.For example:Research question: How could the blood be on both sides of the sock found in OJ’s house if he wore the sock during the murder? Conclusion: Based on the data analyses of five
peer-reviewed resources, three resources believed that the blood had
been planted by the detectives. One resource stated that the blood could
have been saturating the socks after he took them off. One resource
stated that he did not wear the socks during the murder.Submit your completed assignment to the drop box below. Please check the Course Calendar for specific due dates.Save your assignment as a Microsoft Word document. (Mac users, please
remember to append the “.docx” extension to the filename.) The name of
the file should be your first initial and last name, followed by an
underscore and the name of the assignment, and an underscore and the
date. An example is shown below:Jstudent_exampleproblem_101504
jgifford_problemstatement_0601.doc

jgifford_literaturereviewredo_0612.docx

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Expert answer:Trial of OJ Simpson Murder Case Research Question
Just from $10/Page
Order Essay

jgifford_datacollection_0614.docx

jgifford_ojsimpsontrial_0522.docx

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Running Head: PROBLEM STATEMENT
1
Problem Statement
Jackie Gifford
Rasmussen College
Running Head: PROBLEM STATEMENT
1
Problem Statement
The O.J Simpson Murder case was among the most followed trials in the history of the
United States of America. In the case in which the African American sportsman was accused of
murdering his wife and her friend, there are several mistakes in evidence collection,
documentation, detection and storage that the police made that impacted the trial outcome. The
mistakes include evidence documentation. The police did not document the evidence carefully.
For instance, a vile of blood collected from the suspect was not documented. The police took the
vile with him to the crime scene. The second mistake that the police did was concerning the
chain of custody. There was evidence in the trial that even though the prosecution calmed came
supported their murder charge. They could not explain the source. Therefore such evidence
whose source could not be traced could not be used. The third mistake was that the police failed
to examine the evidence and the crime scene carefully. For example, a pair of socks was not
identified until two months after the murder when the socks were found in the bedroom of the
accused. The defense team argued that the blood on the socks had been smeared. There was also
a case of poor handling of evidence; for example, evidence from the crime scene was left in the
forensics van on a hot day instead of being taken in soon. The contamination of evidence is
another mistake that was made. For example, the police officer who carried around a vile of
blood from the suspect may have contaminated the crime scene to incriminate O.J Simpson. The
carelessness left room for suspicion that the police tried to implicate O.J in a murder that he may
or may not have committed. (Luongo, M. 2018).
Running Head: PROBLEM STATEMENT
In conclusion, one of the questions for research in the effect of mistakes made by the
police in the verdict that was made in the case. The second research question is the changes that
were made in the collection and storage of evidence by the police after the case to avoid such
mistakes by the police. Did the police tamper with evidence? Was the evidence mishandled?
1
Running Head: PROBLEM STATEMENT
1
References
Luongo, M. (2018). Throwing out Junk Science: How a New Rule of Evidence Could Protect a
Criminal Defendant’s Right to Confront Forensic Scientists. JL & Pol’y, 27, 221.
Running head: LITERATURE REVIEW
1
Literature Review
Jackie Gifford
Rasmussen College
LITERATURE REVIEW
2
Literature review: Annotated Bibliography
The trial of O.J. Simpson for the killing of his estranged wife and her friend in their
condo is one of the landmark trials of the criminal justice system in the U.S and the world;
especially mistakes that law enforcement agents make when collecting evidence from a scene of
the crime. This annotated bibliography provides sources that look at this landmark trial and the
criminal justice system in relation to the case.
Fairchild, H. H. & Cowan, G. (2010). The O.J. Simpson Trial: Challenges to Science and
Society. Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.53, No.3, pp.583-591.
In their study, Fairchild and Cowan (2010) observe that of immense public and scientific
interests was the gap in different aspects that include public attitudes, perceptions as well as
reactions to the final verdict at the trial. As such, the authors are categorical that the trial and its
outcome generated many ideas that revolved around race as an inadequate approach in
understanding the different attitudes, the perceptions, and reactions that the trial created. The
article asserts that instead of the race was used in different simplistic ways and believes that the
trial reflected inherent broader issues concerning racism and discrimination as well a criminal
justice system which was keen on proving that Mr. Simpson was responsible for the murder of
Nicole and her friend. As such, this source demonstrates that social relations remain the core of
an effective criminal justice system which is keen on using evidence to prove a case of guilt on
an accused as opposed to using such relations to implicate someone when evidential mistakes
lead to a mistrial.
LITERATURE REVIEW
3
Murphy, D. (2017). O.J. Simpson is One-Man Book Industry. Retrieved from

OJ Simpson is One-Man Book Industry


In his article, Murphy (2017) discusses the different movies and films done about the
case of Orenthal James Simpson or simply O.J. Simpson. In this article, the author asserts that
for over 23 years after the murder of Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman, different documentaries
have been produced to try and piece up to the evidence to show those who might have killed the
two lovers. Through books and television series and programs, the murders and the subsequent
trial generated a formidable cottage industry. Through his analysis of the book “If I Did It” by
Pablo Fenjves, Murphy demonstrates that the trial was full of accusations against O.J. Simpson
without any scientifically proven evidence by law enforcement in California. This source is
essential because it illustrates the difficult relationship that O.J. had with his wife Nicole before
their divorce. The source based on the accounts in the book that depicts an angry O.J. on the
night of the murder with the two friends and another person who gave the accused a knife that is
suspected of having been used to kill Nicole. The source illustrates that while O.J. was acquitted
through a jury trial, no substantial evidence was presented in the court by the police to prove
conviction beyond a reasonable doubt. This source is important since it shows that no clear
details will ever suffice to pin the murder on the former celebrated NFL players who lived on the
fast lane during his career.
Luongo, M. (2018). Throwing out Junk Science: How a New Rule of Evidence Could
Protect a Criminal Defendant’s Right to Confront Forensic Scientists. JL & Pol’y,
27, 221.
LITERATURE REVIEW
4
As observed by Lungo (2018), the carelessness handling of the evidence in the murder of
the two people might have led to the mistrial in this case. Glaring mistakes were noted in the
collection as well as the documentation and presentation of the evidence in the court. For
instance, law enforcement officers failed in their duty to document the evidence in a careful
manner. For example, the vile of blood that was collect from O.J was never documented by the
officers. In fact, the vile of blood was taken to the crime by the detectives. The chain of custody
in the trial was poor; especially on how they sourced the evidence for the case. For instance, they
could not offer an explanation of how they accessed their evidence. Evidence presented in a
court without a source is inadmissible and cannot be used in a criminal trial like the one in this
case. For instance, the law enforcement agents could not trace the pair of socks at the crime
scene and O.J’s bedroom until after two months during the investigation and trial.
This source shows that mistakes done by law enforcement agents in their investigation
have the potential to affect a final verdict delivered in the court. For instance, the changes made
to the collection as well as the storage of the evidence in this trial demonstrated the errors by the
law enforcement and their attempts to implicate O.J. Simpson without sufficient evidence.
Pak, E. (2019). O.J. Simpson Murder Case: A Timeline of the ‘Trial of the Century.’
Retrieved from https://www.biography.com/news/oj-simpson-trial-timeline
Pak (2018) provides a timeline in the case against O.J. Simpson in his article in
Biography.com. Through this article, one gets the important events and decisions as well as
actions that defined the trial, right from the time when the murders are reported to the televised
chase between the police and the main suspect in the case; O.J. Simpson. The article discusses
the deliberations that the jurors made and their verdict after over three hours to exonerate James
Simpson in the killing of his divorced wife.
LITERATURE REVIEW
5
Propper, V. (2013). (In) Decent Exposure? Law in Film, Media, and Literature, 2 Berkeley
Journal of Entertainment & Sports Law, vol.2, No.1, pp. 230-244.
It suffices that at the core of this landmark trial was the use of forensics; especially DNA
evidence in the conviction of the accused as posited by Propper (2013). Legal evidence extracted
by the police officers all exonerated the main suspect in the murder. For instance, when O.J. was
asked to put on a glove that was found at the scene, it did not fit him. As such, the defense team
used this evidence to show that the accused was not guilty. Further, the question of activism
arises in this trial as opposed to the use of evidence and robust evidential proof to ensure that a
suspected killer does not get away with a heinous murder that attracted not just national but
global attention.
LITERATURE REVIEW
6
References
Fairchild, H. H. & Cowan, G. (2010). The O.J. Simpson Trial: Challenges to Science and
Society. Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.53, No.3, pp.583-591.
Luongo, M. (2018). Throwing out Junk Science: How a New Rule of Evidence Could Protect a
Criminal Defendant’s Right to Confront Forensic Scientists. JL & Pol’y, 27, 221.
Murphy, D. (2017). OJ Simpson is One-Man Book Industry. Retrieved from

OJ Simpson is One-Man Book Industry


Pak, E. (2019). O.J. Simpson Murder Case: A Timeline of the ‘Trial of the Century.’ Retrieved
from https://www.biography.com/news/oj-simpson-trial-timeline
Propper, V. (2013). (In) Decent Exposure? Law in Film, Media, and Literature, 2 Berkeley
Journal of Entertainment & Sports Law, vol.2, No.1, pp. 230-244.
Running head: DATA COLLECTION AND DATA ANALYSIS
Data Analysis
Jackie Gifford
Rasmussen College
1
O.J. SIMPSON’S CASE
2
Research question: How could the blood be on both sides of the sock found in OJ’s house if he
wore the sock during the murder?
The following are the codes from the analysis;
Code 1 He did not wear the
Code 2 The blood was
Code 3 He stepped in the
socks
planted by detectives
blood
Scheck
MacDonell
Fuhrman
Murphy
Lee
Fenjvez
From the analysis, it can be concluded that O.J. Simpson did not wear the socks found
under his bed by the prosecution team, this is because the defense lawyers found out that a video
taken by Los Angeles Police Department did not show the socks under O.J. Simpson’s bed.
Therefore, this may prove that the accused did not were the socks. However, a photograph taken
at a later time after the video had been taken. Additionally, Lee and MacDonell examined the
sock using a stereo microscope and found out that blood was present on both the outside and
inside something is practically impossible because if the accused was indeed wearing the socks
blood strains would have been present only on the outside. From these findings, Lee and
MacDonell concluded that the blood strained socks were planted by the detectives in order to
implicate O.J. Simpsons on the murder of his ex-wife and her male friend.
O.J. SIMPSON’S CASE
3
References
Fairchild, H. H. & Cowan, G. (2010). The O.J. Simpson Trial: Challenges to Science and
Society. Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.53, No.3, pp.583-591.
Luongo, M. (2018). Throwing out Junk Science: How a New Rule of Evidence Could Protect a
Criminal Defendant’s Right to Confront Forensic Scientists. JL & Pol’y, 27, 221.
Murphy, D. (2017). OJ Simpson is One-Man Book Industry. Retrieved from

OJ Simpson is One-Man Book Industry


Pak, E. (2019). O.J. Simpson Murder Case: A Timeline of the ‘Trial of the Century.’ Retrieved
from https://www.biography.com/news/oj-simpson-trial-timeline
Propper, V. (2013). (In) Decent Exposure? Law in Film, Media, and Literature, 2 Berkeley
Journal of Entertainment & Sports Law, vol.2, No.1, pp. 230-244.
Running head: O.J. Simpson Murder Trial
O.J Simpson Murder Trial
Jackie Gifford
Rasmussen College
1
MURDER TRIAL
2
The murder trial of OJ Simpson is one of the most popular and most celebrated murder
cases in the history of the US. The suspect, OJ Simpson, had previously played for the NFL and
was apprehended and brought to trial for the reported murders of his ex-partner, Nicole, and Ron
Goldman, the friend to his murdered wife. The crime scene was discovered by a neighbor after
she got suspicious upon noticing that Nicole’s Akita had blood on its body and discovered the
two bodies. The neighbor then notified the police (Pitts, Giacopassi, & Turner, 2008).
The brutal murders occurred on one chilling night of 12th June, 1994, and involved the
death of Nicole Brown and her friend, Goldman, due to stabbing wounds outside her condo in
LA. The investigation started when Simpson was on a flight to Chicago, and he claimed to have
learned of the murders while there. He later took a flight home and was interviewed by the
police. It was discovered that he carried some bags into his Chicago flight on the same night of
the killings and could not be traced. Simpson was automatically considered the main suspect.
Instead of Simpson surrendering to the police after learning of the imminent charges against him,
he hid in his friend’s sport utility Bronco. The police learned that Simpson held a firearm to his
head, and they pursued the Bronco at a low speed for over an hour. The chase was broadcasted
live nationwide, with his fans standing on the streets to support him. He was later apprehended in
his California home and detained.
Simpson’s trial started in January of 1995, and the attorneys stressed that there was
strong evidence of domestic violence before and after his 1992 divorce with his wife, and this
made him the main suspect. His ex-wife had reported various domestic violence incidences. A
bloody glove retrieved from the crime scene resembled that retrieved from Simpson’s house, but
his attorneys argued that it was too small for him after he was made to fit it in court. The trial
MURDER TRIAL
3
lasted over 8 months, with testimonies from about 150 witnesses, including Kato Kaelin, Allan
Park (the driver to the limousine), and LAPD officers. The lengthy and tiresome trial was
broadcasted all over the nation, and at long last OJ Simpson was cleared from the murders,
because there was no evidence linking him to the crime (Bugliosi, 2008).
MURDER TRIAL
4
References
Bugliosi, V. (2008). Outrage: The five reasons why OJ Simpson got away with murder. WW
Norton & Company.
Pitts, W. J., Giacopassi, D., & Turner, K. B. (2008). The Legacy of the OJ Simpson Trial. Loy. J.
Pub. Int. L., 10, 199.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code ESSAYSHELP