Expert answer:Peer Review Writer’s Workshop

  

Solved by verified expert:I need two 500 word reviews written. These reviews will critique the authors’ works but will need to be constructive. You should only use positive and encouraging words and provide actionable ways that the authors can improve their literary work for their targeted audience. Please review the full rubric before starting. Note that these works are individual chapters from the author’s novel and may only be judge based on the content in that section not the overall book. You will not need to focus on grammatical errors but on the use of literary elements. I will attach the 2 works that will be reviewed once I have selected a tutor.
eng_359_module_four_writers_workshop_rubric.pdf

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Expert answer:Peer Review Writer’s Workshop
Just from $10/Page
Order Essay

ENG 359 Module Four Writer’s Workshop Guidelines and Rubric
Overview: In Module Four, you will participate in your first peer-to-peer workshop in this course. Participating in a workshop with your peers is a great way to
get feedback that you can use to improve your story.
Prompt: In an original post in the Module Four Writer’s Workshop, submit the draft of the first half of your collection of short stories, or beginning of a novel,
that you submitted to your instructor in Module Three. Do not include any notes in your submission. In this first workshop, your peers should critique the work
on their own without any guidance or requests. Be sure to post this piece as soon as possible so that your peers can begin critiquing it.
Then, choose two stories from the topic to critique. Be sure to select stories with the fewest or no responses first. If a post already has two replies, pick a post
that has no replies or only one reply. Replies made to a post that already has two replies will not be counted in the required two replies.
Remember: Use examples from your peer’s story to illustrate your ideas. Focus your areas of critique on the story plot, point of view, character development,
and dialogue, appropriate to the genre they have chosen.
Be sure to include the following critical elements and see the guiding questions below each element to help you in your critique:

Analysis and Evaluation: Apply course concepts from ENG 329 and ENG 349 to analyze the piece. Specifically, pay attention to the following elements of
fiction:
o Are the character’s motivations clear? Do these motivations feel organic and realistic in the context of the story’s conflict?
o Is the character fully developed, physically, mentally, and emotionally?
o Does the plot have a clear conflict, rising action, and satisfying resolution?
o Does the plot have strong pacing, where not too much (or too little) is revealed to the audience at once?
o Is the setting described using rich sensory details? Are there sections of the text that could be elaborated on more (or, are there sections that
could be condensed)?
o Does the story use details that are realistic and engaging? Are there any details that feel irrelevant or unnecessary?
o Does the dialogue reveal subtext and avoid excessive exposition? Does the dialogue build organically?
o Is point of view consistent throughout the story?
o Is the story’s voice realistic and consistent with the plot, characters, and setting?
o Are there any words or passages that seem vague or disconnected? Are there words or passages that do not align with the rest of the story in
some way?
o Does the author use literary devices, such as metaphor, imagery, irony, and juxtaposition to reveal a deeper theme within the story?
o Are transitions helpful for signaling a shift in time or location?

Suggestions: Provide specific suggestions for areas that need improvement.
o Are there any sections of the text that do not align with the rest of the story? What could the author do to help develop these sections?
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o

In what way can the author develop the character so that he or she is fully developed on the page?
Are there any gaps in the plot that may need to be filled? Are there any unrealistic portions of the plot that may need to be revised?
Is the dialogue realistic, and in what ways can it be revised to avoid excessive exposition?
What sections of the text could be cut back without losing the main conflict and theme of the story?
What sections of the text could be developed more to help pull in the audience?
If the story is following a familiar conflict or theme, what are some ways in which the author could add a unique yet realistic twist to the text?
What lingering questions do you have after completing the story? Which of these questions could be answered within the story’s current form?
What was your overall impression of the story’s success?
Engagement: Provide a critique of the work of at least two of your classmates.
Consider the following for providing constructive criticism:
As the reviewer:
1. Take time to read the work thoroughly. You will likely need to read it through several times. You might want to read the piece in its entirety, and then jot
down your first impressions. Then, you will want to read it a second (and even third) time to develop your critique. Take notes within the margins of the
text. These notes should focus on areas you enjoyed, areas that may need additional work, and any lingering questions you may have after reading that
section of the text.
2. You are critiquing the piece, not the person. Your goal is to help the author achieve his or her goal. Keep the author’s vision of the piece in mind, and
remember to keep your personal judgment about the subject matter to yourself. You may not be the intended audience for the piece but, to the best of
your ability, analyze it as if you are the intended audience.
3. Use the assignment’s objectives to focus your critique. Keep all elements of fiction in mind, and avoid focusing on minor grammar/mechanics/formatting
errors.
4. Your critique should start with the strengths of the piece. What works and why? Follow up with areas for improvement. What did not work and why?
Provide specific examples.
5. Next, suggest actionable areas for revision. Keep the tone positive and provide specific, actionable suggestions for revision.
 Good Example: The character has a clear desire to overcome her struggles with loneliness. For the next draft, I would consider including a
specific scene or two that illustrates this loneliness in a public setting. Can we see how she grocery shops, for example? How does she act within
the workplace? Can other characters in the story tell that she’s so lonely?
 Bad Example: The character feels lonely, but I don’t get why. It’s a very confusing situation.
6. Then, include any lingering questions you may have after completing the piece. The questions should, again, clearly connect to the vision of the piece,
and they should not pass judgment on the author.
7.
Your final comment should be an overall summary of the piece and your impressions, focusing on the positive.
As the author:
1. Listen to (or read) the critique carefully, avoiding any desire to defend your choices.
2. If you are unclear about what the reviewer means, ask him or her to clarify.
3. If after hearing/reading the critique, you have any questions, feel free to pose them to the group. For example, you might ask: “Do you feel the narrative
arc is confusing or not believable, given the world of the story?
4. Take special note of repeated commentary on the same issue. This may signify an area for improvement.
5. Thank the reviewers for their feedback. If some commentary was especially helpful, that is useful information for the reviewer. Different writers have
different strengths and different reviewers have different strengths, too.
6. Remember, it is your writing. You are the ultimate decision-maker on what goes into the piece. You do not have to accept any of the suggestions for
improvement if you do not want to. However, at the same time, do not just dismiss suggestions out of hand.
 Example: Several reviewers suggest that your conclusion was not as strong as it could be. Try redrafting it. If possible, allow some time before
you read it again. You may be surprised at the results.
7. Accept that negative feedback comes with the territory. Remember not to take the feedback personally. The ultimate goal is to not to make everyone
happy, but to make your writing the best that it can be.
Guidelines for Submission: Post one initial post and follow up with at least two response posts, critiquing your peers’ work.
For your initial post (1):
Submit a draft of your creative piece as soon as possible, but no later than Thursday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone..
For your response posts (2):
Provide a critique of at least two different classmates’ works of creative fiction by Sunday 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone. If a post already has two replies,
pick a post that has no replies or only one reply. Replies made to a post that already has two replies will not be counted in the required two replies.
Constructive critiques should follow these formatting guidelines: Each critique should be approximately 500–750 words in length. You may also include in-line
comments in the submission if the file was uploaded as a Word document.
Rubric
Critical Elements
Analysis and
Evaluation
Exemplary (100%)
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
provides exceptional detail and
correctly utilizes course-related
vocabulary
Suggestions
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
correctly applies course-related
vocabulary
Engagement
Provides critiques for at least
two classmates
Submission is free of errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, and
organization and is presented in
a professional and easy-to-read
format
Articulation of
Response
Proficient (85%)
Accurately applies course
concepts to analysis of the
piece with sufficient evaluation
of the piece’s characters,
events, descriptions, and
transitions
Provides specific suggestions
for areas that need
improvement in the dialogue,
story, and plot, and provides a
summary of story’s overall
success, with appropriate focus
and tone
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
Needs Improvement (55%)
Applies some course concepts
to analysis of the piece but with
significant gaps in detail or does
not sufficiently evaluate the
piece’s characters, events,
descriptions, and transitions
Provides some suggestions for
areas that need improvement in
the dialogue, story, and plot,
and provides a summary of
story’s overall success, but
suggestions and summary lack
specific detail or are not framed
appropriately in focus and tone
Provides a critique for one
classmate
Submission has major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that negatively impact
readability and articulation of
main ideas
Not Evident (0%)
Analysis does not apply course
concepts or does not provide
evaluation of characters,
events, descriptions, and
transitions
Value
30
Does not provide suggestions
for areas that need
improvement in the dialogue,
story, or plot, and does not
provide a summary of story’s
overall success
30
Does not provide any critiques
of classmates’ work
Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that prevent understanding of
ideas
30
Total
10
100%

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code ESSAYSHELP