Expert answer:Pediatric Chart assignment

  

Solved by verified expert:Assignment: Age Appropriate Health Maintenance Screening and Associated ToolsThis Assignment includes ten different pediatric cases that require further evaluation with a developmental testing tool. Selecting the correct tool is vitally important in getting accurate data that promotes early identification and intervention. A template is available to you as an Excel spreadsheet in Course Documents, and is specifically designed for this Assignment.After you have selected the standardized developmental testing tool that is appropriate for each of the following cases, address the following:
Does the tool measure the domain(s) of concern?
Is the tool “age appropriate?”
Does the tool address cultural considerations?
Who is to administer the test?
Is the reliability and validity of the tool acceptable? How did you assess these measurements?
How much time is involved in using the tool?
Is the language of the tool applicable to the patient and family?
Helpful tip: It is recommended that you keep all of your course work in a virtual (or physical, or both) portfolio for easy access in clinicals as well as future pediatric encounters.Assignment RequirementsBefore finalizing your work, you should:
be sure to read the Assignment description carefully (as displayed above);
consult the Grading Rubric (under Course Documents) to make sure you have included everything necessary; and
utilize spelling and grammar check to minimize errors.
Submit your Assignment to the Unit 2 Assignment Dropbox before midnight on the last day of the unit.
mn581_unit2assignmentgradingrubric__1_.xlsx

mn581_unit2assignmenttemplate__1_.xlsx

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Expert answer:Pediatric Chart assignment
Just from $10/Page
Order Essay

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Unit 2 Assignment. Refer to the Assignment directions for spe
Instructors: Enter total available poin
Content Rubric
Content Quality
Resources
Writing Deduction
Rubric
Introductory
Emergent
0–1.9
2–2.9
Student successfully completes less
than 55% of the screening template.
Chart data contains minor and/or major
errors, and data may not follow current
guidelines.
Student successfully completes
55–75% of the screening template.
Chart data contains minor errors and
no more than one major error. Data
follows current guidelines.
Does not include any resources (0) or
sources utilized are not relevant and
credible sources of information (1).
Not all sources utilized are relevant
and/or credible and/or does not meet
the required number of sources.
Introductory
Emergent
0–1
2
Grammar &
Punctuation
The overall meaning of the paper is
difficult to understand. Sentence
structure, subject verb agreement
errors, missing prepositions, and
missing punctuation make finding
meaning difficult.
Several confusing sentences or one to
two confusing paragraphs make
understanding parts of the paper
difficult, but the overall paper meaning
is clear. Many subject verb agreement
errors, run-on sentences, etc. cause
confusion.
Spelling
The many misspelled words and
incorrect word choices significantly
interfere with the readability.
Many typos, misspelled words, or the
use of incorrect words making
understanding difficult in a few places.
Paper has some good information or
research, but it does not follow
Order of Ideas &
Length Requirement assignment directions and is lacking in
overall organization and content.
The order of information is confusing
in several places and this organization
interferes with the meaning or intent of
the paper. However, the paper has a
generally discernible purpose and
follows assignment directions overall.
APA
Feedback:
There is some attempt at APA
formatting and citing. There are one or
more missing parts such as the cover
page or references list. Citation
information may be missing. Citation
mistakes make authorship unclear.
There is an attempt to use APA
formatting and citing. There are both intext citations and reference listings.
Citation information may be missing or
incorrect (i.e., websites listed as in-text
or reference citations). There is an
attempt to cite all outside sources in at
least one place. Authorship is
generally clear.
rections for specific content requirements.
Enter total available points in cell H2, and values between 0 and 4 in the yellow cells in the Score column.
Total available points =
Practiced
Proficient/Mastered
3–3.9
4
Score
Student successfully completes 76–97% of
Student successfully completes 98–100% of the
the screening template. Chart data may
screening template. Chart data is accurate with
contain a few minor errors, and follows
current guidelines.
current guidelines.
Supports many opinions and ideas with
relevant and credible sources of
information; meets the required number
and types of resources.
Supports opinions and ideas with relevant and
credible sources of information; meets or
exceeds the required number and types of
resources.
Practiced
Proficient/Mastered
3
4
A few confusing sentences make it difficult
to understand a small portion of the paper.
However, the overall meaning of a
paragraph and the paper are intact. There
may be a few subject verb agreement
errors or some missing punctuation.
There are one or two confusing sentences, but
the overall sentence and paragraph meanings
are clear. There are a few minor punctuation
errors such as comma splices or run-on
sentences.
Some misspelled words or the misuse of
words such as confusing then/than.
However, intent is still clear.
A few misspelled words normally caught by
spellcheckers are present but do not significantly
interfere with the overall readability of the paper.
The order of information is confusing in a
few places and the lack of organization
interferes with the meaning or intent of the
paper in a minor way.
The overall order of the information is clear and
contributes to the meaning of assignment. There
is one paragraph or a sentence or two that are
out of place or other minor organizational issues.
A few sentences may be long and hard to
understand. Meets length requirements.
Score
There is an overall attempt at APA
formatting and citation style. All sources
appear to have some form of citation both
in the text and on a reference list. There
are some formatting and citation errors.
Citations generally make authorship clear.
There is a strong attempt to cite all sources using
APA style. Minor paper formatting errors such as
a misplaced running head or margins may occur.
Minor in-text citation errors such as a missing
page number or a misplaced date may occur.
Quotation marks and citations make authorship
clear.
lls in the Score column.
Total available points =
60
Weight
Final Score
90%
0.00
10%
0.00
Content Score
0
Weight
Final Score
35%
0.00
35%
0.00
20%
0.00
10%
0.00
Writing
Deduction
0.00
Final Score
0.00
Percentage
0.00%
Pediatric Case
1. A two-month-old child that does
not respond to loud noises
A four-month-old child that does
follow movement with his eyes
A six-month-old child that does not
return affection to caregiver
A nine-month-old child that does not
respond to her names
A one-year-old who is unable to crawl
Selected testing tool (cite
source)
A two-year-old who is unable to
follow simple directions
A three-year-old who is unable to
walk up stairs
A four-year-old Spanish-speaking child
who knows only approximately 20
words. Family is from Cuba and is nonEnglish speaking.
A five-year-old who is unable to focus
on one activity for more than five
minutes; easily distracted
A seven-year-old who was very
sociable and interactive with peers at
six years old is now isolative does not
show interest in interacting with
others
What domains are Measured? Suitable age groups?
Is culture addressed?
Who should administer this
test?
What is the reliability and
validity?
How much time is involved to
administer the test?
Is it available in other
languages?
How are results interpreted?

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code ESSAYSHELP