Expert answer:answer the following questions

  

Solved by verified expert:In Unit 6, you developed three different research questions that could be addressed using a one-sample, dependent samples, or independent samples t-test. In Unit 7, you expanded the research question that should be addressed using the independent samples t-test, to include more than two groups. In this unit you will further expand your One-Way ANOVA question to include two independentvariables.Two-Way (factorial) ANOVA: Expand your research question from Unit 7 to include a second independent variable with at least two groups (levels). Write out your new expanded research question. List and describe both of your independent variables and the levels or groupings within each independent variable. Also note your dependent variable. Define your Choices: Why you have chosen to investigate these two independent variables? How do you think they will affect your dependent variable? Testing and Predicted Results: What type of interaction do you expect to see between your independent variables? How might this interaction affect the dependent variable? Predict Results: Predict and share your hypothetical results and conclusions for all of your groups and interactions. Write a paragraph describing the final conclusion of your research assuming that you reject all of the null hypotheses (Ho1, Ho2, and Ho3). Be sure to talk about what the Post Hoc test might show in this case and the possible interactions between your two independent variables with respect to your dependent variable. While you are welcome to use SPSS, it is not required for this Discussion.
discussion_anova.docx

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Expert answer:answer the following questions
Just from $10/Page
Order Essay

Running head: ANOVA TESTS FOR COMPARING MULTIPLE SAMPLE MEANS
ANOVA Tests for Comparing Multiple Sample Means
Name
Course
Date
1
ANOVA TESTS FOR COMPARING MULTIPLE SAMPLE MEANS
2
ANOVA Tests for Comparing Multiple Sample Means
I am describing the use of a two-sample independence test to assess the differences or
similarities existing the scores registered by students of public and private schools. The goal of
this test is to determine whether the students of a private school are higher than the scores of a
public school. This test is however limited in the sense that it considered only one school of each
type, as the independence sample t-test is defined by the comparison of a maximum of two
samples. While the analyst could potentially conduct a series of different hypothesis
independence tests, the realization of such a high number of tests would have been extremely
tedious work. Worst even, the fact that the analyst could compare exclusively two samples at a
time would leave the pave open to doubts as to whether he had examined the appropriate schools
to address the research question (Gravetter & Walnau, 2016).
As opposed to a scenario of performing multiple t-tests, the analyst could have employed
a one-factor ANOVA test for the comparison of various sample means. The advantage of using a
one-way ANOVA test is that it enables the analyst to compare the means of all the schools
immediately. It will also allow the evaluation of whether the mean score of the students was the
same in all the schools or if there is at least one school in which the students scored a higher or
lower mean than in the rest of schools (Mertler & Reinhardt, 2016). While having more ready
access to this information, the ANOVA test per se is unable to predict which is the school
showing such a different mean score compared to the rest of schools. If the one-way ANOVA test
indicates that there is at least a sample separate from the rest, the analyst would then need to
perform a post-hoc analysis to identify which is the different sample.
From the above, the research question applicable to the current analysis would be of the
type “Does the school have any influence on the mean score of students on a standardized test?”.
ANOVA TESTS FOR COMPARING MULTIPLE SAMPLE MEANS
3
As discussed previously, a one-way ANOVA test would be the best approach to evaluate this
research question, as it enables the simultaneous comparison of the mean score of students in
multiple schools. If necessary, the analyst can then complement this test with a post-hoc study to
identify which schools show a different performance to the rest.
The hypotheses tested through this one-way ANOVA test are:

Null hypothesis: The school does not affect the mean score of its students in the
standardized test, as all the mean values reported by the different schools are
equivalent to each other. This hypothesis could be written as µ1 = µ2 = µ3 = … = µn,
where the sub-index represents each of the different schools included in the survey.

Alternative hypothesis: The school has some effect on the mean score of its students
in the standardized test since at least one of the schools shows a different mean from
the rest. This hypothesis could be written as µ1 ≠ µ2 ≠ µ3 ≠ … ≠ µn.
One critical aspect of accounting for in the realization of this survey is that all the
students in the different schools need to perform the same type of test. This aspect is essential
because failing to do so may introduce additional sources of variability in the results, which
would potentially confound the obtained conclusion from the analysis. The data collected for the
study will thus involve the scores obtained from the different students in each of the schools. The
number of schools or samples included in the analysis would, in principle, be as high as possible.
A total of 20 schools seems to be a logical approach as a compromise between having a high
number of schools and maintaining a low cost for the analysis. In this sense, if the students of so
many schools have similar scores resulting in the absence of enough evidence to support the
rejection of the null hypothesis it is unlikely that including more schools will vary the obtained
result. Ideally, these 20 schools will comprise both public and private schools.
ANOVA TESTS FOR COMPARING MULTIPLE SAMPLE MEANS
4
The sample size or the number of students in each of the schools that takes part in the
survey, on the other hand, would be of 30 to obtain a detailed evaluation of the mean score
recorded by the students in each of the different schools. Consequently, the full survey will
comprise a total of 20*30 = 600 data.
The scores obtained for the different students in the 20 schools will not likely differ
substantially, as the variability in the student performance within the various schools is likely to
be of the same order of magnitude than the variability between the different schools (Bernacki,
Nokes-Malach, & Aleven, 2015). Consequently, the one-way ANOVA test will most likely result
in a low F score and a high p-value, above the .05 target significance level, that indicates that
there is not enough evidence to support the rejection of the null hypothesis. If performed, the
post-hoc study will thus not show any substantial difference between the mean scores obtained
on the different schools.
ANOVA TESTS FOR COMPARING MULTIPLE SAMPLE MEANS
References
Bernacki, M. L., Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Aleven, V. (2015). Examining self-efficacy during
learning: variability and relations to behavior, performance, and learning. Metacognition
and Learning, 10(1), 99-117.
Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2016). Statistics for the behavioral sciences. Cengage
Learning.
Mertler, C. A., & Reinhart, R. V. (2016). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods:
Practical application and interpretation. Routledge.
5

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code ESSAYSHELP